MIX
MAGAZINE - Dec
1, 2000
By
Barbara Schultz
You know that
feeling you get when you're making the perfect car tape, when every
song you add suggests the next one, and you can't wait to pop it
in and crank it up on your next road trip? Well, Bob Irwin does.
He's turned it into one of the most successful and respected careers
in the remastering/reissue business.
Irwin is the guitar-player/music-seller/music-lover who put his
passion and his savings into his own independent reissue label,
Sundazed. In the mid-'80s, when the major labels were still stumbling
around the technology needed to turn their vinyl into the new CD
format, Irwin was researching unreleased material, working from
original multitrack masters - creating the kind of reissues that
we now know and take for granted. Sundazed's first releases were
so exceptional in their sonics and content that the majors took
notice. Sony Music (then CBS Records) recruited Irwin to help launch
the wonderful Legacy label.
Today, Irwin continues to operate in both spheres. He still produces
nearly every release on Sundazed, working in his own lovingly designed,
all-analog mastering suite, situated in his hometown of Coxsackie,
N.Y. The Sundazed catalog now comprises releases from artists including
Buck Owens, The Byrds, Nancy Sinatra, The Hollies, and scores of
other rock and pop acts from the '50s, '60s and '70s. He also produces
dozens of releases for Legacy every year out of Sony Music Studios
in Manhattan. Over the years, he's worked on more than 300 releases
for Legacy, including reissues and packages of Santana, Janis Joplin,
and a just-completed Stevie Ray Vaughan box set. He is also part
of the team producing country reissues for Legacy's new American
Milestones series.
Irwin loves his job; he takes the greatest pleasure in sharing his
music discoveries with others, and so his joy is multiplied exponentially
every year, as his resume and his audience grow. We spoke with him
just as he wrapped up the Stevie Ray Vaughan project and was shifting
gears to dig back into Sundazed's packed schedule of fall releases.
What are you working on now?
At Sundazed, we have a lot of wonderful things on tap. It's our
crunch time right now. We're spending a lot of time getting our
year-end releases ready. Along with our flow of compact disc issues,
we still do a lot of 180-gram audiophile vinyl here, and we've really
stepped that up this Christmas season, because it's been embraced
so well. So, in addition to our CD releases, we're coming out with
projects such as the Otis Redding catalog on 180-gram LP, including
Dictionary of Soul, Otis Blue and Otis and Carla Thomas' King and
Queen.
A lot of those were already reissued by Rhino on CD. Is
that something you get to do, because they're not doing vinyl versions?
That's correct. We've always had a uniquely wonderful working relationship
with Rhino, going back to our infancy. [Owner/founders] Richard
Foos, Harold Bronson and [engineer] Bill Inglot and I have long
been friends, and we've always worked closely. We've been very fortunate
over the years, as Rhino has accumulated different catalogs, they've
come to us and said, for example, "We've just acquired The
Meters catalog," which we've had wonderful success with this
year, and they'd say, "We're doing a two-CD Best Of and an
individual-CD Very Best Of. Are you interested in the album catalog?" And I'd always say yes, especially if it's a wonderful catalog like
that. We continue to work well together to this day.
Is it safe, then, to say that Rhino's work is more to create
new collections or packages, and yours is getting back to original
versions in new editions?
That's correct in some respects. I think that because we are comparatively
smaller and very focused on things that would tend to slip through
the cracks at larger labels, those projects are often best served
with a home on Sundazed, because here they're regarded as priority
releases.
What else is on the schedule for Sundazed?
Coming this fall is a Gram Parsons collection of early, unissued
material that was recorded by his bandmate and friend in 1965 and
1966. It's tentatively called Another Side of This Life - The Lost
Recordings of Gram Parsons. Along with really cool folk standards,
Gram is playing baby-footsteps versions of some of his songs like "November Nights" and "Brass Buttons," the earliest
known recordings of these songs. It's a very insightful project.
Plus, we're re-releasing Buck Owens & His Buckaroos' complete
Carnegie Hall concert from 1966 - that will be the unedited show
- and the first ever Don Rich anthology. Don Rich was the guitar
player and the fiddle player for Buck Owens and passed away in the
early '70s; he's been such an influence on so many players.
Also on 180-gram vinyl, we're coming out with a few titles from
Booker T. & the MGs' catalog, two Spirit titles, and Bob Dylan's
Bringing It All Back Home from the original mono master, which has
been out of print for over 35 years, which is pretty awesome!
You're not the producer of every single one of these reissues,
are you?
Well, actually, I am. We have a staff of 15 people here at Sundazed,
and nearly everyone actively participates in A&R and the creative
process. There are always several plates spinning, but everything
is done in-house, from the conceptualizing of the project to the
actual mixing and mastering to the graphic components.
So, you have your own studio there?
Yeah, two studios built right here. The first room is an all-analog
room, which has some really marvelous vintage machines and gear.
We have a beautiful Michael Spitz-built ATR that we do all of our
2-track and full-track mono work on. I also recently acquired a
beautiful tube-driven Presto half-inch 3-track machine from 1958,
virtually unused. It's an absolutely gorgeous centerpiece of our
vintage machine collection.
What kind of monitors do you use?
In my main room, I currently have both a pair of Paradigm Studio
Monitors and Genelec 1030As with a 1092A subwoofer. The Paradigms
are powered by Cary SLM 100 tube mono blocks. Much of the room is
tube gear.
To be honest, my work, hobby, passion all revolve around Sundazed
and the joy of acquiring new projects to release and vintage gear
to use. I usually say to friends that I'm not looking to buy an
island, but I flip out when I get a new piece of tube gear for the
studio, and it's really true! We have just a beautiful array, the
old meeting the new, ranging from vintage Pultecs, LA-2As and 3As,
to new Tube-Tech, Sontec, Joemeek, API, etc., outboard gear.
I take it, then, that you prefer to work in analog.
Yes. All of my mastering work is done in the analog domain, unless
something comes in on a digital source, but we prefer to work all
analog as long as possible.
And the other room?
The other room is our digital suite that's equipped with a full
Sonic Solutions system, and in this room we have an array of digital
gear and converters that we're using, Apogee PSX 100s, AD122s. The
monitors in the second room are Genelec 1030As, again with a subwoofer.
Did you design the rooms yourself?
Yeah. Our building was built in the mid-1800s. It's right on the
Hudson River, and by saying that, I mean you could literally throw
a rock out the window and plunk it in the river! It's a beautiful
location, and the rooms upstairs are just naturally great-sounding
rooms, to the point where we have a lot of people looking to work
here, but the rooms already go, well, not 24 hours a day, but they
easily could if I could go 24 hours a day! We just purchased another
historic building just across the street. We will be putting another
studio on the third floor there and use the additional space for
the mountains of graphic and Web work that go on here.
Who are the other technical people on your staff?
There's Al Quaglieri. He's from my neck of the woods. When we first
considered starting Sundazed, I took inventory of some of my closest
friends and their various talents, and Al is one of the first guys
I went to, because along with being a musicologist, he has wonderful
studio chops. So, he and I together have worked on many, many projects.
Al mastered most of The Meters releases that we did here. I also
want to mention our assistant, Jayme Pieruzzi, who does a lot of
Sonic editing and cleanup work.
Tell me about the Sundazed process. What happens from getting
the permissions for an idea until its release?
That really varies from release to release. There are times, though
not often enough, we'll get what we refer to as a "project
in a box," when the licensor delivers all the multis and the
masters to the door, along with a wide array of photos, and a great
set of liner notes!
More often, we're working five or six months ahead of ourselves
on the release schedule. Here's the breakdown: Tim Livingston and
my wife Mary basically run the entire show here at Sundazed. They
supervise a talented staff that includes both Efram Turchick and
Stephanie Kennedy, who are in effect the general information officers
and production coordinators of Sundazed. They are the conduit through
which all components for a release will flow to get to the appropriate
departments. They make sure that I have all the tapes here for the
project when studio time is scheduled, make sure that Rich Russell,
head of our design department, has all the photos and elements needed,
that the liner note writer has been assigned and delivers on time,
get appropriate ref's out, etc.
Once a project idea is put down on paper, the potential licensor
is contacted and, hopefully, a deal will be struck. That process
can take anywhere from a day to a year. The agreement could be with
an original producer, or an artist who owns their original masters,
or with a major label. So, the process of getting a project onto
the schedule can be rather involved. Once that's taken place, we
always like to sort through all the masters up front, so that we
have the most cohesive and deepest A&R possible. We want to
find out if there's any unreleased material that might warrant being
included, uncover any rare material, etc.
I'm assuming that your goal is to go back to the original
masters whenever possible.
Absolutely. Al and I cut our teeth by digging around tape vaults
for a good 10 years before Sundazed started, so we enjoy getting
dirty and touching tape! A good example would be a project we're
working on right now for our soul series. Oscar Toney Jr., an artist
from the '60s, recorded a tremendous album for the Bell label along
with a handful of wonderful singles, and because of our sleeves-rolled-up
archeology, we now have the luxury of being able to work with all
of the multitracks, all of the original mixdowns, session reels,
and more.
Who had them?
Arista Records controls the Bell Records catalog, so the project
is licensed from Arista. It's wonderful when all the masters are
delivered here, then the real fun begins when you start combing
through all the multitracks to see what's there. And in the case
of Oscar Toney, we found a bevy of wonderful demos and outtakes,
and because we have the vintage 1-inch 8-tracks and half-inch 4-tracks,
we're able to create some beautiful first-time stereo mixes. While
we've never looked to be involved in revisionist history, we enjoy
being able to present things in stereo when there are recordings
that make for good stereo. That said, simply having a multitrack
doesn't necessarily mean that you can have championship stereo.
It usually has to have been recorded with a potential stereo mix
in mind. But sometimes, due to the budget constraints or time constraints
at the time, there was no stereo mix done. That's where we'll step
in.
With that in mind, tell me about your philosophy as a mastering
producer. What's more important to you: perfect fidelity, or recordings
that are historically accurate?
It's always the music first. At Sundazed, we say that we want our
consumer to get a history lesson, but not know that they're getting
one. It has to be fun, for sure. We try not to be analytically dry
in our packages. Everything we do is presented in an upbeat, authentic,
fun way, and that means that the music definitely comes first. If
the question is, do we have a track that's an astounding performance
where the fidelity is less than exceptional, we would most likely
opt to use that performance, with the artist's sanctioning, of course.
The artists are involved in every release, whenever possible.
What we include also depends on the amount of material we have to
work with. We just finished creating a Mighty Sam McClain package.
Mighty Sam is enjoying a renewed career right now as a contemporary
blues artist, but previously made some phenomenal R&B records
in the '60s. For this package, there was such a wealth of material,
it was either increase the track listing, which we did do, or go
to a two-CD set, which we did not do, and that meant that some things
had to be left behind.
When you have, as we did, 22 or 24 stellar tracks, and your track
listing is confined to 20 cuts, then we might look at the sonics
of a cut or two to see if that is perhaps the track that should
be left off the package. But I don't want to make it sound like
that's what we're shopping for, because we'd never leave an important,
wonderful cut off because it was lacking in stellar fidelity. In
the case of Mighty Sam, we had a wonderful bounty of performances.
There were two or three demo sessions that we thought the performances
were wonderful on, but on some of the cuts you could hear the limiters
overloading, and we did make a couple of choices and excluded a
couple of songs based on that criteria.
Have there been specific recordings for Sundazed over the
years that you can single out as breakthrough successes for your
label?
In the very beginning, 11 years ago, we started putting out wonderfully
obscure '60s garage groups and wild surf and hot rod material from
the '60s, and the Pulp Fiction soundtrack used five or six of our
artists, so that was a great vehicle for visibility early on. Other
tracks that we control are often used in soundtracks or commercials.
So, what happens is, as the label grows naturally and as the catalog
gets larger and more visible, that in turn attracts other artists
and potential licensors to our label.
From what I understand, it was because of your meticulous
and creative work with Sundazed that Sony Music became interested
in you as a producer for their Legacy label.
That happened very early on. The first couple of Sundazed releases
received high praise in places like Stereo Review and The New York
Times, and I received a phone call from CBS Records. This was before
there was a Legacy, and I began as acting as a consultant, suggesting
titles that they might want to consider for re-release. That grew
into a freelance production agreement as Legacy was formed.
When you produce for Legacy, you work in Sony Music Studios
in Manhattan, correct?
Right. We use a variety of rooms, depending on whether we're mixing
or mastering, but because I'd say probably 60 percent of my work
is mastering-related, I primarily work with an engineer whom I consider
to be one of the most talented engineers at Sony Music Studios,
Vic Anesini. Our relationship began when I started my first CBS
project back in 1989. The studio was in a different location, it
was on 52nd street, and it was very modest in comparison to what
it is today. There were no live rooms; it was for mastering, and
any mixing was done right in the mastering rooms.
Tell me about the studios you use today.
One of the wonderful things about working at Sony that does filter
down to the Sundazed level is that at Sony Studios, there's a wonderful,
never-ending parade of cool new equipment to be auditioning and
using, so we're constantly doing shootouts and comparisons. But
the basics of the room that I work in right now include a pair of
Dunlavy SC-4 speakers, four Sherwood Sax hand-built tube amps, bi-amped,
to power them, and a custom Sony-built mastering console. There's
also a lot of the same gear that is used at Sundazed: the Sontec
EQs, a wide variety of stereo compressors and limiters, and, importantly,
the same philosophy; we keep the mastering chain very, very pure.
We work analog as long as we can and go to digital at the end, and
it's very project-dependent as to what A/D converter we're going
to use.
What have you been working on lately for Sony/Legacy?
The project that has occupied my past four months has been the upcoming
Stevie Ray Vaughan box set. It was actually conceptualized years
ago. Epic Records asked Legacy to examine Stevie's catalog, and
the first thing we did was envision a box set, but we knew that
it would take months or years of planning and research to do properly.
So, what we did first was to re-examine each of Stevie's studio
albums and prepare remastered, expanded editions of each.
But we still concentrated on the proposed box set; and I continued
to research material with Jimmie Vaughan, Stevie's brother; seeing
what was out there in the way of unissued performances and live
recordings. And the answer was a lot. Because of the vast amount
of material, this wasn't a project that could be put into focus
easily. So, we worked on it for a long while, always keeping the
file active and making notes.
Meanwhile, the expanded editions of Stevie's catalog, along with
the Greatest Hits Volume 2 set, called The Real Deal, that we had
done were successful, so Epic asked us for finalization of the box
set for this fall. Jimmie and I again worked together, enlisting
some help from friends that were Stevie experts, and we assembled
this wonderful three-CD plus a DVD disc, 54-track box set, 36 tunes
of which have never been issued before. It's studio material and
live. Often, Jimmie and I felt that there was a certain vitality
offered in a particular live performance that the studio counterpart
recording might not have had.
We also wanted to showcase some of the early material that Stevie
recorded before he got to Epic Records, so on Disc One, we used
select tracks that were very powerful, outstanding early performances.
The set opens up with a recording of Stevie with the band Paul Ray
and the Cobras in 1977. This was a band he played with in Austin
that was kind of like a pickup gig for him, but when they went into
the studio, they let Stevie have the spotlight on a couple of tunes.
He's doing a version of The Nightcaps' "Thunderbird," singing lead and playing a marvelous solo; it absolutely showcases
what was to come.
The disc builds through various live recordings and club gigs, demos,
soundchecks, up through the Montreux Jazz Festival performance in
'82, where the audience was booing him because he was a rock 'n'
roll guy at a jazz festival. But, that very commotion is what enhanced
Stevie's visibility for folks like Jackson Browne, David Bowie,
John Hammond and others. It was after the Montreux performance that
Bowie asked Stevie to perform on the Let's Dance album and tour
with him. All of this led to Stevie's deal with Epic Records.
So, the set is organized chronologically?
The set is roughly chronological, not strictly, because there were
very obvious starting and ending points that revealed themselves
as we worked. "This has to kick off Disc Two," and "this
has to close Disc Three." It's hard to explain, but I guess
it's similar to a runner's high.
When you're that involved in a project, if you have passion for
what you're working on, the project can often reveal itself as you
go, and there are times that you can barely contain yourself as
you're putting the project together. Those are the best kind of
projects, where your heart kind of pounds while you're putting it
together, and you know what has to come next, and you know what
has to follow that, and everyone in the room has the same idea at
the same time. It's like sitting in the living room with a huge
stack of 45s and running for the next one before the first one is
over, and saying to your friends, "You think that's great,
you've got to hear this!" |